By Amy Bracken
With all the catastrophic oil spills that have happened
around the world, one might assume that energy companies and regulators have
learned their lessons, but that couldn’t be farther from the truth.
After every disaster, there’s talk of strict laws,
enforcement, and oversight. Talk.
Indeed, some good measures are put in place, but they’re undermined by cut
corners. BP surely had an assortment of impressive measures in place when, as a
White House report concluded, it took cost-cutting measures that increased the
risk of a blowout.
But now let’s look at Exxon, since that’s who recently
spilled tens of thousands of gallons of crude into the Yellowstone River in
Montana.
I used to live in Valdez, Alaska – a small town made famous
by the Exxon-Valdez oil spill, in which tens of millions of gallons leaked into the Prince William Sound,
killing more than 100,000 birds, otters, seals and whales. Working for a local
radio station 20 years after the disaster, I interviewed subsistence and
commercial fishermen, hunters and tour boat operators about the tragedy. Some
still teared up talking about the sight of the flailing oil drenched wildlife.
Litigation took so long that many affected by the spill died
before seeing any of the compensatory and punitive damages they were owed. Even
for those who did receive thousands of dollars, what the spill had taken from
them would be lost forever. After the accident, nearby Native American villages
emptied out. Residents were forced to abandon subsistence lifestyles, join the
cleanup effort, and then seek jobs elsewhere, precipitating the loss of already
endangered languages and cultures. Families were also casualties of the spill,
as instability, unemployment and depression broke up marriages.
Today, Prince William Sound looks pristine again, but tar
balls continue to cling to the sand of some beaches, and the herring population
has never rebounded.
Meanwhile, locals are terrified of another spill – not so
much from another tanker in the Sound as from the pipeline that runs through
Alaska and across precious wetlands upon which moose, bear, salmon, swans, and
millions of shorebirds depend. And there’s good reason to be terrified. Spills
along other parts of this pipeline are, in fact, a common (and often
unpublicized) occurrence, with thousands of barrels leaking due to corrosion
and accidents.
And then there’s the latest large spill, on the Yellowstone
River in Montana. The cause of the crack in the pipe under the river is still
unknown, and it took the company an hour to stop the leak. By that time, some
42,000 gallons had spilled into the rushing water. With the river flooded, oil
coated lawns, farmland and ponds. Among the affected are fishermen (the river
is known for its fishing), farmers (who use the river for irrigation) and
neighbors (who worry about health effects of inhaling fumes from the spill).
But the scope and severity of the impact is not yet known. Oil has been found
more than 270 miles downstream.
Now let’s return to Belize. If such a disaster can happen in
the United States at the hands of one of the world’s richest and largest oil
companies, what does it indicate about the risks of oil exploration by a small
private company in a country like Belize, where laws and enforcement are far
more lax?
Texas-based US Capital Energy
(USCE) has been exploring for oil within the Sarstoon Temash National Park,
cutting seismic lines that cross both Sarstoon and Temash rivers, and many
creeks. If a spill were to happen in this area, the impact on the nearby
wildlife and villages could be catastrophic. The park itself is home to
threatened and vulnerable species, like the West Indian Manatee, the Hickatee
Turtle, and the Morelett’s Crocodile – all of which could be directly hurt by a
spill. This is one reason that the convention on wetlands in Ramsar, Iran,
designated the park ‘a wetland of international importance.’ And oil in the
Temash would surely spill into the ocean and reach the barrier reef, which lies
just some 50 miles offshore – a small fraction of the distance oil has traveled
in the Yellowstone River. Finally, as in Alaska, small, nearby indigenous
villages would be most affected by any harm to this natural environment.
And yet, protection of this precious area is anything but
guaranteed. The Belizean government is so blithe to health, safety and
environmental risks that it didn’t even demand an Environmental Impact
Assessment for USCE to explore there until it was required to by a Supreme
Court ruling (SATIIM vs. Forest Department). It is this very administration,
along with the determined but cash-strapped Sarstoon Temash Institute for
Indigenous Management (SATIIM), that is charged with protecting the park.
The prospect of oil in one’s backyard can spark the
imagination, eliciting hopes of quick development and wealth, an escape from
the hardship of daily life. USCE might indeed build a swing set or a building
to house a clinic and bring some computers to a village. It might also provide
some temporary jobs and pave a road, but the real long-term and irreversible
impacts just might be environmental, economic, and cultural devastation.
Corporations and governments might not learn from past
mistakes, but the people who will suffer from them have a responsibility to
study, learn, and join together to demand their own protection.
For more information on oil drilling and the Sarstoon Temash
National Park, contact SATIIM: www.satiim.org.bz,
satiim@btl.net, 501-722-0103, 81 Main Street, Punta Gorda Town, PO Box 127,
Toledo District, Belize, C.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment